The International Association for the Philosophy of Sport (IAPS) is holding a group session at the American Philosophical Association Central Division Meeting in Chicago, IL.
February 27, 2014; 5:30 – 7:30pm
Chair: Shawn E. Klein (Rockford University/SportsEthicist.com)
Speaker: Mary Gwin (Oklahoma State University)
Commentators: Craig Carley (Phoenix College) & Shawn E. Klein
Dr. Gwin will present her paper: “A Worthy Conception of Virtue for Sport”
The following is the introductory paragraph from Dr. Gwin’s paper.
My goal in this paper is to discuss a particular conception of virtue for sport that I think is more apt than competing conceptions of virtue found in the virtue epistemology and virtue ethics literature. While we often talk about virtues in sport, as far as I can tell from the literature on virtue and sport there has been little or no discussion of the particular conception of virtue that is most apt for sport. For example, Michael Austin (2009) develops a neo-Aristotelian notion of magnanimity for sport to argue that a magnanimous athlete will use sport to develop her own moral character. Heather Reid (2012), as another example, uses a Mengzian/Aristotelian notion of honesty to argue that the virtue of honesty in sport should be understood as accurate self-assessment of one’s own abilities. As someone who is sympathetic to both projects of virtue epistemology and virtue ethics, I applaud these efforts, and I do not think that anyone can deny that virtue plays an important role in the philosophical analysis of sport, whether it is ethical or epistemological. In this paper, I begin with a brief discussion of two competing conceptions of virtue—reliabilism and responsibilism—found in the virtue epistemology and (and somewhat arguably) virtue ethics literature. Then, I turn to Baehr’s alternative, though responsibilist aligned conception of virtue, the personal worth conception. Finally, I argue that practical wisdom and honesty, two goals central to an athlete’s achievement of the lusory goal of sport, are best understood on this conception. As a consequence of my view, I argue, possessing these virtues makes the athlete better qua person and athlete. If I am right about a personal worth conception of virtue being an apt conception of virtue for sport, then we may be able to further the discussion of virtue in sport in general.