J.S. Russell’s “Are Rules All an Umpire Has to Work With?”, published in the Journal of the Philosophy of Sport in 1999, presents a theory of sport adjudication that Russell argues better explains sport, the role of officials and umpires, and guides those officials in officiating their sports. Russell’s paper is one of the first explicit attempts to explain and apply interpretivism, one of the central philosophical accounts of sport. This is part one of two episodes on Russell’s paper.
Subscribe on iTunes:
Related Links and Information:
- J.S. Russell, “Are Rules All an Umpire Has to Work With?,” Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, vol. 10, 1984, pp 61-70.
Opening and Closing Musical Credits:
- “Slow Ska Game Loop” Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License
One response to “Examined Sport: Russell, “Are Rules All an Umpire Has to Work With?” Part 1”
This is a great/concise summary and overview of a very relevant topic in sports. Great listen!